close
close

Netanyahu’s far-right government is pursuing its dictatorial agenda to consolidate its Greater Israel policy

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is accelerating efforts to create an authoritarian state while waging a war to annihilate the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

Unable to achieve the dual goals of establishing Jewish supremacy in “Greater Israel” and of preventing any possibility of the emergence of a Palestinian state alongside Israel within Israel through democratic means, the Zionist state must oppress its own citizens, including Jews.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right) talks with Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich during the weekly cabinet meeting at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, Israel, Sunday, Jan. 7, 2024. (AP Photo/Ronen Zvulun)

The Knesset (parliament) ignored massive opposition to the government’s “judicial overhaul” and passed a key piece of the legislative agenda last year that aimed to limit the Supreme Court’s power to invalidate legislation that conflicted with Israel’s Basic Law, the closest thing to a Zionist state constitution. However, it was later invalidated by the Supreme Court.

Undeterred, Justice Minister Yariv Levin refused to submit for approval to the Judicial Selection Committee the nominations of a new Supreme Court chief justice and two new Supreme Court justices to replace several retired ones, because the government lacks the majority to push through its nominees. This workaround ensures that the government now has the necessary right-wing majority on the Supreme Court to pursue its dictatorial agenda.

The government has introduced a series of new, anti-democratic laws, tightening surveillance over Palestinians and Israeli citizens and restricting freedom of speech.

The new laws give the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic spy agency that reports to the Prime Minister’s Office, greater authority to hack into private computer systems used to operate CCTV cameras and delete, modify or disrupt the material on them, without the knowledge of the computer owner or court approval. This is allegedly allowed in cases that could threaten “national security or the continuity of the IDF’s operational functioning in relation to military operations in war,” when it is urgently necessary and when access cannot be obtained “in other ways that are less intrusive.”