close
close

Google’s antitrust ruling could pose a $20 billion risk to Apple

Apple’s lucrative deal with Google could be in jeopardy after a US judge ruled that the Alphabet-owned search giant was operating an illegal monopoly.

Wall Street analysts said Tuesday that a potential remedy for Google to avoid antitrust action could be to terminate a deal that would make the company’s search engine the default search engine on Apple devices.

Heart Security Last Change Change %
GOOGLE ALPHABETS INC. 158.29 -0.96

-0.60%

AAPL APPLE INC. 207.23 -2.04

-0.97%

According to Morgan Stanley analysts, Google pays Apple $20 billion a year, or about 36% of what the company earns from Safari search ads, for the privilege.

Analysts estimate that if the deal falls through, the iPhone maker’s profits could fall by 4-6%.

FEDERAL JUDGE RULES GOOGLE VIOLATED ANTITRUST LAW

Apple headquarters sign

Apple benefits from exclusivity payments made by Google that could be barred under antitrust law after Monday’s ruling. ((Photo: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images) / Getty Images)

According to media reports in May, citing a document filed by the Justice Department in the antitrust case, the agreement is valid until at least September 2026, and Apple has the right to unilaterally extend it for another two years.

“The most likely outcome is that a judge will rule that Google no longer has to pay for the default setting, or that companies like Apple must proactively encourage users to choose their search engine, rather than setting a default search engine and allowing consumers to make changes to their settings if they wish,” Evercore ISI analysts said.

BUFFETT’S BERKSHIRE CUTS APPLE OWNERSHIP BY HALF, BOOSTS CASH STOCK TO $277B AS IT GOES ‘DEFENSIVE’

Google HQ

Google plans to appeal the court’s ruling that found the company illegally maintained a monopoly. (Photo: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Apple shares were flat Tuesday, underperforming a broader market rebound from Monday’s global sell-off. Alphabet was little changed, having fallen 4.5% in the previous session.

“The message is that if you have a dominant market position with a product, you better avoid using exclusivity agreements and make sure that any agreement you enter into gives the buyer the freedom to choose a substitute,” said Herbert Hovenkamp, ​​a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

Of course, the “remedies” phase could be lengthy, followed by potential appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals, the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. The legal wrangling could last until 2026.

AI tilt

Still, if the partnership is dissolved, Apple would have several options, including offering customers alternatives like Microsoft Bing or potentially a new search product based on OpenAI.

Analysts agree that the ruling will accelerate Apple’s shift toward AI-powered search services. The company recently announced it would bring OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot to its devices.

APPLE’S NEW AI FEATURES WILL BE DELAYED AFTER iOS 18 RELEASES: REPORT

Apple logo

Google pays Apple $20 billion a year for advertising revenue from Apple’s Safari search engine, according to Morgan Stanley. (Photographer: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Moving away from exclusive deals that would help Apple avoid regulatory scrutiny, the company said it is also in talks with Google to add its Gemini chatbot and plans to add other AI models as well.

Apple is also modernizing Siri with artificial intelligence technology that will give her more control over tasks that have proven difficult in the past, such as writing emails and interacting with news.

While these efforts are expected to generate little profit in the coming years, they could help capitalize on the new technology.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

“Apple may see this as a temporary setback, especially since the company makes a lot of money from its Google search deal, but it is also an opportunity for the company to move towards AI-based solutions in search,” said Gadjo Sevilla, an analyst at Emarketer.