close
close

Online sellers on Walmart’s Flipkart store sue Indian regulator over antitrust probe

Three online sellers operating on Walmart’s Flipkart platform have sued India’s antitrust authority over an investigation that found they, Flipkart and rival Amazon violated competition laws, according to court documents seen by Reuters.

The filings came after antitrust investigations concluded in August found that Amazon and Flipkart, some of their sellers and smartphone brands, violated local competition laws by giving undue preference to select online sellers and prioritizing certain offers, Reuters reported.

Flipkart is one of India’s largest e-commerce players and a rival of Amazon.

In an attempt to quash the critical proceedings, three sellers on the platform have filed applications in the Karnataka High Court seeking to “set aside” the inquiry report and stay the trial before the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

Link to Google NewsFor the latest news, follow The Daily Star’s Google News channel.

The suits by Amazon and Flipkart sellers could potentially delay the investigation process, which began in 2020 and was initiated after retailers from the Confederation of All India Traders filed a complaint to the regulator. Amazon and Flipkart deny any wrongdoing.

Three Flipkart sellers – CIGFIL Retail, Wishery Online, Xonique Ventures – claim in their lawsuit that they were asked to provide data during the investigation to help officials but were later named as defendants, which, according to court documents, contradicts due process.

“The purported investigation… is arbitrary, opaque and unfair,” the sellers argued in three separate court filings likely to go to trial next week.

Flipkart and CCI did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Reuters could not immediately reach the three sellers whose claims are being reported for the first time.

Last week, a former Amazon seller also sued the CCI and obtained an interim injunction blocking the investigation. The lawsuit filed with the court – seen by Reuters – argued that CCI failed to notify the company before making it a defendant in the case.