close
close

Polaris Renewable Energy (TSE:PIF) shareholders suffered a 23% loss on their investment in the stock three years ago

To justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it is worth striving to beat the returns of a market index fund. However, the risk of selecting stocks is that you will likely buy companies that perform poorly. We regret to inform you that long-term Polaris Renewable Energy Inc. (TSE:PIF) shareholders have seen this happen with the share price falling 34% over three years, compared to a market return of around 18%. Worse still, it’s down 8.4% in a month, which isn’t pretty at all.

It’s worth assessing whether the company’s economics have followed these disappointing shareholder returns, or whether there’s some divergence between them. Let’s do that.

Check out our latest analysis for Polaris Renewable Energy

While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, stock prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare earnings per share (EPS) to the stock price.

Polaris Renewable Energy has seen its EPS decline at a compound annual rate of 28% over the past three years. This EPS decline is worse than the 13% compound annual decline in the share price. This suggests that the market remains somewhat optimistic about the long-term sustainability of earnings, despite previous EPS declines.

Below you can see how EPS has changed over time (you can find the exact values ​​by clicking on the image).

increase in earnings per shareincrease in earnings per share

increase in earnings per share

We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases over the past year. However, future earnings will be much more important to whether current shareholders make money. It is worth taking a look at our free Polaris Renewable Energy earnings, revenues and cash flow report.

What about dividends?

When analyzing investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR includes the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. It could be argued that the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the returns a stock generates. We note that for Polaris Renewable Energy the TSR over the last 3 years was -23%, which is better than the share price return mentioned above. This is largely due to the dividend payouts!

Another perspective

While the broader market has gained about 14% over the past year, Polaris Renewable Energy shareholders are down 6.1% (even including dividends). Even good stocks sometimes fall in price, but we want to see improvements in the fundamentals of a company before we get too interested. Long-term investors wouldn’t be so nervous, as they would have earned 1.5% per year over five years. Perhaps the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it’s worth checking the fundamentals for signs of a long-term growth trend. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to really gain insight, we need to consider other information as well. For example, risks. Every company has them, and we’ve seen 3 Warning Signs for Polaris Renewable Energy (2 of which are disturbing!) you should know about it.

There are many other companies whose insiders buy stock. Probably yes. NO I want to miss it free list of undervalued small-cap stocks that insiders are buying.

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Canadian exchanges.

Have an opinion on this article? Concerned about the content? contact us with us directly. You can also email us at editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This Simply Wall St article is for general information purposes only. Our commentary is based solely on historical data and analyst forecasts, and is based on an objective methodology. Our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It is not a recommendation to buy or sell stocks and does not take into account your objectives or your financial situation. Our goal is to provide you with long-term, focused analysis based on fundamental data. Please note that our analysis may not reflect the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Contact us directly. Alternatively, send an email to [email protected]