close
close

California with large utilities and limiting incentives for local solar projects

California’s utility regulator has adopted new rules for on-site solar projects despite warnings from clean energy advocates that the move would undermine efforts to expand solar options for low-income customers.

Author's profile photo

Julia Carta

CalMatters

The state’s largest utilities were in favor of the new regulations.

Community solar projects are typically small-scale, on-site solar panels that can serve renters and homeowners who cannot afford to install their own rooftop solar panels. They are part of the state’s overall strategy to ultimately power the power grid exclusively with renewable energy.

Impact on solar providers and residents

The California Public Utilities Commission’s 3-1 ruling preserves and expands programs that will allow any ratepayer to subscribe to a project pool and receive a 20% rate reduction, Commission Chairwoman Alice Reynolds said. However, it also reduces future compensation for solar providers and residents.

The Commission is calculating the benefits of small-scale distributed solar projects that provide a “service” of transmitting clean energy to the power grid and lowering transmission costs by serving nearby communities. Developers of photovoltaic systems are paid in line with the value of the benefits their project provides.

The formula adopted today essentially reduces the value of small-scale distributed renewable energy in the future, providing less incentive to build new community solar projects.

Uncertainty regarding future financing and profitability

For the foreseeable future, grants and incentives to help promote community solar installations will remain in place, and will be covered by the recent $250 million grant California received through the federal Solar For All program.

One of the concerns of solar energy advocates is what will happen when the funding pool dries up and the financial incentives to develop solar energy evaporate.

“The foundations of a sustainable program should not be built on one-time money,” said Derek Chernow, western regional director for the Coalition for Community Access to Solar Energy.

Although California has been a leader in promoting solar energy and advocating for a zero-emission electric grid, the state’s efforts to encourage smaller solar projects have been lackluster. One example of a missed opportunity that critics point to is not requiring local photovoltaic projects to have energy storage systems that would allow energy to flow after the sun goes down.

“We’re not done yet,” Reynolds said, adding that the programs could be modified and improved in the future.

With electricity bills skyrocketing for many Californians, she was also critical of the impact of “cost shifting,” the idea that subsidies given to local solar projects are costs borne by all ratepayers. This is the basic argument of fairness that the Commission has used in other proceedings to justify grant reductions.

But advocates say changing or reducing subsidies and other incentives for the still-maturing industry will result in fewer solar installations, ultimately cutting off low-income ratepayers from the benefits of renewable energy. Community solar programs are designed to ensure that at least 51% of the energy generated by projects serves disadvantaged customers.

Critics question California’s clean energy leadership

Advocates bemoan what they say is a delay in California’s clean energy leadership and criticize Gov. Gavin Newsom, who delivered the keynote speech at the Vatican Climate Summit last week, for failing to hold the state’s powerful utilities and oil companies accountable.

The commission’s solar decision quickly added to a list of what critics say is a disturbing pattern of rollbacks on key renewable energy policies.

“The CPUC’s recent series of decisions threatens to undermine California’s progress on clean energy,” the Solar Energy Industries Association said in a statement. “It is time for Governor Newsom and state leaders to take power on the commission before it does more harm to customers and the state’s clean energy economy.”

As with previous closely watched decisions, the committee heard from countless organizations, including the solar industry and environmental justice groups, advocating for programs that will expand access to clean energy and lower energy bills.

There were no public comments during this morning’s hearing, but at least two state legislators expressed their opposition to the proposal. Assemblyman Christopher Ward noted that the updated proposal was only released this week and condemned it as “fatally flawed.”

“It does not reflect the intent of the bill,” Ward, a San Diego Democrat, told commissioners, referring to legislation he authored that required the commission to review its provisions. An unintended consequence of today’s decision, he said, would be to discourage new projects.

An aide to Sen. Josh Becker, a Democrat from Menlo Park, read a letter from the lawmaker expressing doubts that the policy would increase access to clean energy.

In lengthy remarks, Commissioner Darcie Houck outlined several concerns about the decision, including her view that it did not go far enough to benefit ratepayers in low-income communities. Much of the commissioner’s opposition focused on regulations that she said would discourage the use of solar energy and prevent a “just and equitable energy transition.”

about the author

Julie Cart is a project reporter on CalMatters’ environmental team who focuses on wildfires and natural resources. Her projects have included an analysis of the state’s efforts to build massive offshore wind farms, a deep dive into the crisis of post-traumatic stress disorder and suicide among California firefighters as wildfires escalate, and the vulnerability of the state’s coastlines to rising sea levels.

About CalMatters

CalMatters is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom dedicated to explaining California politics and policy.